天才一秒记住【畅想小说网】地址：http://www.cxtra.net
aable”
arenotmutuallyexclusivesismayjudgeonecaseasplagiarismyetstillsideritacceptable.
Whenaskedifhiriowritethepaperlagiarism，alltheAmeritsagreedandthoughtthatthistable.Similarly，mostesestudents（92.6%）alsothoughtthatalagiarismandfoundituable.However，twoesestudelagiarisThereasoheydidnotthisomethingf，asshowheatofoerviewee:
Ithinkthat[hiriowritethepaper]isnotplagiaris..becausehiremeanspaymht?SoIwillpaythewriter.Idon’tstealhispaper.Healsogotprofits，too.IfIsaer，aolefromhim，aeacherasmyoer，thatisplagiaris（StudentC9）
Thisatrevealedthatsomestudentshaddiffereandingsofplagiaris
&ofthecaseofusingwordsthathavebeegdisplayedadisthedAmerits.MostAmerits（64.7%）believedthatsualagiarism，andthoughtituable.versely，esestudeheoppositeopinion—onlynine（33.3%）ofallthe27esepartitsjudgedittobeplagiarisMoreover，oftheswhojudgeditasplagiarism，sixsidereditacceptableeveitlagiarisAlookatthefivestudeheirhighschooledutheUSyieldedmresults.Althoughthree（60%）ofthemjudgeditplagiarism，havingasimilarcorreseratetotheirAmeriterparts（64.7%），theyhadverydifferentattitudestotability;thatis，allofthefivebelieveditacceptableeventhoughtheyklagiarisThismayindicateafar-reaflueheemphasisoionineselearningculture.Manyscholarshaveremarkedonthis.Martin（2012）hasudentsfromAsianbadsteermslike‘Itissaid....’aideais...’withoutmentiohorspecifically...sarenotrequiredbecausealloftheknowledgethatsi]book”
（p.264）.Shei（2005）said，“Intermstowrite，[ese]studentsareencedaimesrequired）toreadandmemorizeportionsofclassicalworksaheir”
（p.98）.Thefollowingwordsfromanintervierovideaclearerpictureofthis.
Ina，whenweuseafamousseofthetimewe’trememberwhosaidthatinwhichessaysaidthat.Butwememorizedthequoteverywellbecauseoureseteacherrequiredustoremembermanypoemsaifulessays.Inourexam，weareaskedtowritethosememorizedpoemsaoo，butwee.Also，riteapositiohewritiion]，ifweusesomeofthosesentenswithoutg，wearenot[accusedof]plagiarizing.Ihinkweareknowledgeable，aeacherwillgiveusahighgrade.（StudentC21）
Whenlookis’judgmentsonthecasesof“other’sarticlesbygthesourcewithoutusingquotationmarks”
and“paraphrasingwordsfromother’sarticlesbygthesourcewithoutquotationmarks，”
itwasfoundthatesestudehosewhoattendedhighsa，werefusedaboutthosetwocases.Theessratesofjudgmentswerelow，suggestingthattheylackedthekgrequiresquotationsmarkshrasi.
Regardiherbideaswithoutgthesourceisplagiarism，88.2%oftheAmeritsand100%ofthefiveesestudentswhofinishedhighstheUSsidereditplagiarism，whileonly50%oftheother22esestudeasplagiarisThismaybeexplaihestudents’ats:
Bideasisean，ritiiveessaysinhighschool，weofiosupportourpositiohinkenoughreasons，soweBaidu[equivalenttoGoogle]formorereasons.Whehoseideasinouressay，weeaotsaidthatwaswrong...EvenifnowyoutellmeIe，Idonotknowhowtociteit.（StudentC9）
TheesestudeeddiffereionsofplagiarismfromtheAmerits;heless，gthecasesthatare“blatantg”
（Peoreseriouscases，theyhadsimilarjudgmentsandattitudes.Whenaskedif“aterialsalmostwordforwordfromaurningitinasone’soasplagiarism，96.3%oftheesestudentssidereditplagiarismandthusuable.However，inothercases，theymayhaveexhibitedsomemisuanding.Notonlydidtheesestudeeaboutaandingofplagiarism，butAmeritsdidso，too.Forexample，inthecaseswithoutusingquotationmarks”
and“gasourcethat’snotactuallyread，”
thecorreseratewasonly64.7%.Therefore，pariswithAmeritsdoesAmeritsarethebenchmark;theyhavesomemispers，too.AmorereasonabletodrawmaybethatAmerits，haviediernacademige，aremorefamiliarwiththeWesternnotionofplagiaris
3.4Students’attitudestiarism
gthediffereweendAmerits’persofplagiarism，peoplemaybetemptedtodrawthethatthesetwogroupsofstudentswouldalsoexhibitdifferentattitudestiarisHowever，resultsfromthisstudyshowedtheopposite，asillustratedinTable6.
&udents’attitudestiarism
&yofthestudeudents（59.3%）audents（64.7%）alike，heldtheopinionthatplagiarismshoulded，asoudeed，
Ithinkitisalluablebecauseitistakingsomeoneelse’sworkandsayingthatitisyourownwork.Thisislyingandsinceythroughmradeitshouldn’tbedoA2）
&herearemaswhobelievedthatsomeplagiarismshouldbetolerated.Whekindofplagiarismcouldbetoleratedierview，alltheaplagiarizingwithoutself-ess，ortoputitashouldbetoleratedifthepersondidoplagiarize，butdiditatlyoruionally.Thefollotsprovidethedetails.
Someshouldbetoleratedbecausetheremaybesomereasoimes，likemaybesomepeettowritethequotationmarksoudentC10）
lagiarismisanissuegmorality，allAmeritsahinkingplagiarismis“stealingandprofitihatisnotyours”
（StudentA2）.Similarly，mostesestudents（88.9%）sideredplagiarismamoralissue，too.Thisistwiththeresultsofthestudiesductedbyotherscholars，whofoundthatmoststudentsthinkplagiarizingism（Bamford&Sergiou，2005;Song-Turner，2008）.However，therewerethreeesestudentswhoheldadifferentopiudewokindsofopiwasthatwhetherplagiarismwasamoralissueorhesituation，asexpressedbyoerviewee:
&[plagiarism]isamoralissuedepeitcauses—ifsomeoneiofinishhomeworkorwritediaryforhimself，thiswon’tharmtheauthor，thenitisnotamoralissue;butifhecopiesorusesother’sworkorideaainhisoer，Imean，academicpaper，thisisamoralissue.（StudentC10）
&heropinion，heldbyohatplagiarismwasnotamoralissue.Theiransayhelpclarifyhisthought:
Ithinkitisjustpeoplebeihknowledge.Iesternscholarsrequireustocitebutthewell-ksorseverrequiredustocitetheTheywritepoemsandgoodessaysforthepublic，thesodeventheheheirsenteneverquote，butpeoplehotheauthoris.（StudentC24）
Thisialthoughmostesestudents，likeAmerits，siderplagiarismm，therearesomeesestudentshavingavagueideaoftextownershipandauthorshipthatmayhavebeeheeselearniingstyle.
本章未完，请点击下一章继续阅读！若浏览器显示没有新章节了，请尝试点击右上角↗️或右下角↘️的菜单，退出阅读模式即可，谢谢！